Mills Home Alumni Association Baptist Childrens Home of North Ca
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561315431
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Rockwell, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7047917866
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alumni Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,375
- Expenses
- $5,545
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANE HELMS BROWN (PRESIDENT)
- PETE KNIGHT (1ST VICE-PRESIDENT)
- CECELIA TOWNSEND WILKERSON (2ND VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JANE HELMS BROWN (PRESIDENT)
- PETE KNIGHT (1ST VICE-PRESIDENT)
- CECELIA TOWNSEND WILKERSON (2ND VICE-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Uphold baptist children's home of nc and support it thru projects on mills home campus, thomasville, nc; monthly support for mills home baptist church - activities for the children in care on mills home campus; and maintain and repair the mitchell museum (first cottage built on mills home campus in 1885)
What it reported doing in 2020
Baptist children's homes of nc - mitchell museum endowment (principal). Please note that we have a project in the amount of aprroximately 100,000.00 that has not been able to be completed due to the pandemic.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.9%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 90.7%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.9% of revenue deployed · 74.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.