Miller Elementary Pto
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331669794
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- New Boston, MI, USA
- Phone
- 7346043960
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,713
- Expenses
- $2,928
- Assets
- $51,381
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAYNA SCHROCK (PRESIDENT)
- JAYD ENGEL (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KRISTA DENTON (HEAD OF COMMITTEES)
- DAYNA SCHROCK (PRESIDENT)
- JAYD ENGEL (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
It is the means for providing fellowship and events for students, their families and staff throughout the year, while raising funds to support programs, improvements to the grounds, supplemental curriculum and to show appreciation to staff which includes adminstrators, the principal and teachers. The pto for past years has been less than clear on its objectives and follow through. It is our mission to make the pto a driving force for the betterment of the school, the students, families and staff in the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
$15,232 generated by secret santa shop. Pto provides a selection of items for students to buy for holiday gifts to family, friends. This fundraiser benefits the students, families and staff throughout the year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.6%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 87.1%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.55; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -42.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 49.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.