Miller Creek School Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510214722
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
San Rafael, CA, USA
Phone
4154923760
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$90,518
Expenses
$77,920
Assets
$85,238

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TRISTEN LEVY (President)
  • Jennifer Ishii (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • TRISTEN LEVY (President)
  • CANDACE MCCONNELL (Co-Treasurer)
  • JAMIE CORTES (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support enrichment programs for miller creek school

What it reported doing in 2025

The Home and School Club supported the following activities: a. Spring Fundraiser: Organized and executed Walkathon to raise funds for HSC operations.b. Spirit Wear: Ordered spirit wear items, collected funds, and coordinated distribution of spirit wear to families.c. Teacher Supplies: Paid for classroom supplies.d. Teacher/Staff Appreciation: Provided staff meals and gifts for holidays and special occasions.e. Technology: Contributed to district technology funds.f. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI): Provided funds for DEI events.g. Family & Student Social Events: Funded and coordinated on site family and student events, such as Web (Where Everyone Belongs) Day, Back to School, Dances, Grade Level End of Year Events.h. Clubs/Programs: Provided funding for wellness center, positive behavior awards, and Garden Club.i. Graduation Activities: Organized and paid for 8th grade graduation ceremony and celebration party.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 97.5%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.9%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84% of revenue deployed · 97.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.