Millbrook Engine Hook & Ladder Co
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141795318
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Millbrook, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8454566775
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fire Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $185,671
- Expenses
- $84,660
- Assets
- $1,314,434
- Liabilities
- $3,239
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JODY SWART (DIRECTOR & PRESIDENT, AUXI)
- MATTHEW F ROCHFORT (PRESIDENT, FD)
Highest reported compensation
- KELLY TOMASULO (2ND LT, FD/SECRETARY): $7,150 total reported compensation
- SHELLEY HOLLINGSWORTH (TREASURER): $5,200 total reported compensation
- KIM BOWNAS (CAPTAIN OF RESCUE/SECRETAR): $1,200 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support volunteer firefighters and rescue squad members, and community fire and rescue department, in town of Washington, New York
What it reported doing in 2024
Support volunteer fire and rescue workers and the town of Washington, New York fire and rescue department.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.1%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 68.6%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54.4%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.53; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.1% of revenue deployed · 68.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 39 of 39 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $7K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.