Millard Sheets Center for the Arts at Fairplex
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954686767
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Pomona, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9096233111
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Visual Arts Organizations
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $104,809
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES E HENWOOD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JAMES E HENWOOD (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL D SEDER (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
- RICHARD CREAN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To establish and operate an art gallery, to produce exhibits that promote understanding and interpretation of the public's art heritage and to furnish educational opportunities in the arts.
What it reported doing in 2013
The millard sheets center for the arts at fairplex presented a curated, thematic exhibition concurrent with the annual los angeles county fair. The purpose of the exhibit was to promote understanding and interpretation of our art heritage. The gallery provided an artist demonstration program, hands on workshops for all fair guests, tours of the gallery and the chance to meet the artist as well as opportunities to purchase art work, books, catalogues and posters. Approximately 300,000 fair guests viewed the exhibition during the 2009 fair
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -55.9% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.