Milford Police Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043202605
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Milford, MA, USA
Phone
5084465809
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,746
Expenses
$75,612
Assets
$22,701

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT TUSINO (President)
  • PAUL PINTO (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT TUSINO (President)
  • PAUL PINTO (Vice President)
  • CARLOS SOUSA (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

1.to act as a bargaining agent for members of the milford police department regarding working conditions, etc.2 to donate scholarships to the young people of milford.3.to get involved with the community by establishing programs with the young people of milford and donating to local programs benefiting the townspeople

What it reported doing in 2017

Scolarships for local area children and donations to local charities

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.8%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 3%; rating input score 3

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -29.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -25.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.8% of revenue deployed · 3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.