Mighty Rights Media Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462015705
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
4045397492
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Media, Communications Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$3,000
Assets
$293
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jessica Bernhart (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Nicholas Farina (Chairman of the Board of Directors)
  • Sayan Palchowdhury (Treasurer of the Board of Directors)
  • Sean Holland (Secretary of the Board of Directors)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mighty Rights Media is an online platform designed to improve engagement with human rights issues. Our website will host human rights reports from around the world, as well as art and media about human rights issues.Mighty Rights Media's goal is to inform a global audience about human rights in a format that is dynamic, accessible, and attractive. Mighty Rights Media will make global human rights reports searchable by region, country, topic, and organization, and will translate the issues into media formats including film, graphic novels, commissioned graffiti, and many other innovative methods of telling complicated stories.

What it reported doing in 2014

In 2014, Mighty Rights Media completed and populated a website hosting international human rights art, media, and reports.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 20%; rating input score 20

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -95.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -167.3% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 20% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $600 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.