Midwife Me Ltd
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851096589
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Valdosta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 2292342505
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,577
- Expenses
- $116,171
- Assets
- $6,492
- Liabilities
- $26,580
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Victoria Gordon RN MSN CNM (Program Director)
- Jayson Anderson (Secretary)
- Meka Hall (Vice Chairman of the Board)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Midwife me, ltd. Is a nonprofit public health program designed to address the poor maternal and infant outcomes and the associated health disparities, specifically targeting the preterm birth rate in rural Georgia by 1) increasing access to care 2) improving the quality of care and 3) decreasing the cost of care. The goal of midwife me ltd. Is to improve the overall health and wellness of the woman before, during and after pregnancy, thereby reducing preterm birth and low birth weight and decreasing infant and maternal mortality. Midwife me, ltd also functions to serve as an alternative for women desiring evidence-based trauma-informed care that is individualized, a low-cost option for their pregnancy care and/or an out of hospital birth experience.
What it reported doing in 2024
Expenses incurred in providing early, enhanced and evidence-based prenatal care, safe and trauma-informed labor and birthing care, and enhanced postpartum care to women of all ages in Georgia counties. Patient services are provided without regards to age, race, or ability to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.09; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -40.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.