Midvale Community Building Community
Legal name: Midvale Community Building Community Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460548747
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Midvale, UT, USA
- Phone
- (385) 887-9002
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,455,840
- Expenses
- $1,201,221
- Assets
- $955,220
- Liabilities
- $190,431
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mauricio Agramont (Executive Director)
- George Larsgard (Director Chairman President)
Highest reported compensation
- Mauricio Agramont (Executive Director): $64,889 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to offer comprehensive healthcare family services and empower individuals to reach their maximum potential.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide food distribution services, preventive, socio-emotional, and educational classes and workshops, including outreach and promotion of community resources available to low income families living in Midvale City, Utah, and surrounding areas. Effective October 1, 2023, Midvale Community Building Community Inc. entered into a contract with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA is a U.S. government agency within the Department of Health and Human Services that advances public health efforts to prevent and treat mental and substance use disorders. Services under this contract commenced in October 2023. However, our ability to collect revenue under this grant was delayed significantly due to the difficulty in successfully satisfying the security requirements of the Payment Managermen System of the U.S. government. Finally, in July 2024, we satisfied the security requirements and were able to successfully submit and collect the drawdown requests for services rendered from October 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024. The effect of this delay was that revenue with a pro rata value of approximately $281,250 could have been billed for the nine months ended June 30, 2024, and to the extent collected during that period would have been recognized as grant revenue using the cash basis of accounting in that prior period. But, under the circumstances that occurred, 100% of the revenue under the grant for the first nine months ended June 30, 2024 was deferred and not recognized on the cash basis of accounting in that prior period. But, under the circumstances that occurred, 100% of the revenue under the grant for the first nine months ended June 30, 2024 was deferred and not recognized on the cash basis of accounting until the year that ended June 30, 2025. Total revenue successfully drawn down, collected, and recognized under the cash basis of accounting was $562,458 for the year ended June 30, 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.6%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.5%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 67.6% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $980K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $65K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.