Midtown Alley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
365065920
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3148822346
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,900
Expenses
$352
Assets
$15,548
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC THOELKE (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIELLE EICKENHORST (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ERIC THOELKE (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIELLE EICKENHORST (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARCUS EICKENHORST (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The midtown alley business alliance was established to support, promote and grow the midtown alley district and the businesses within it. The alliance is committed to realizing the vision of the collective community: to create st.louis's most creative district. Together, our community determined that placemaking and beautification were the priority, followed by "putting midtown on the map" through events/community building and marketing/pr.

What it reported doing in 2023

Welcoming new businesses to the area, including art st. Louis, catalyst coffee, slice pizza bar, blue jay brewing, anita caf, vidiera wine bar, and nexus dining

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 91
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.2%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 97.8%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 44.17; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $352 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.