Midnight Riders of Mondovi Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391681892
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Mondovi, WI, USA
Phone
6083230321
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$69,355
Expenses
$24,808
Assets
$98,809

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNI JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRIS OCONELL (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JENNI JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRIS OCONELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHELLY ANIBAS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote youth development, education, and community engagement through the organization and hosting of rodeo events for children, these activities provide opportunities for participants to develop skills in horsemanship, responsibility, teamwork and sportsmanship in a safe and structured environment. The organization emphasizes age-appropriate competition, safety education, and mentorship, helping young participants build confidence, discipline, and respect for animals and others. In addition to rodeo events, the organization may offer clinics, education programs, and community outreach activities to further support youth development and public awareness of agricultural traditions. All activities are conducted in a manner that supports the organization's charitable and educational mission and benefits the community.

What it reported doing in 2025

These costs cover all day to day and event expenses incurred. No grants have been received

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 62% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 64.2%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.98; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.