Midlands Mechanical Apprentice Coal
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922908596
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Columbia, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8036910918
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Job Training
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $272,001
- Expenses
- $135,179
- Assets
- $441,117
- Liabilities
- $77,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT ADAM WHITE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT ADAM WHITE (PRESIDENT): $14,400 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We forge innovative partnerships to develop and deliver sustainable, employer-based apprenticeship programs that empower individuals for successful careers in the mechanical trades. Through a blend of rigorous classroom instruction and comprehensive on-the-job training, we equip students with the essential skills and knowledge to excel in diverse mechanical industry vocations and achieve lasting professional success.
What it reported doing in 2025
A four year comprehensive vocational education program that trains the next generation of plumber, hvac technicians, sheet metal workers and welders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 74% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30.4%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 57
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.26; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -20% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 43.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 30.4% of revenue deployed · 56.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $14K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.