Midland Rape Crisis Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751673093
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Midland, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4326827273
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,332,257
- Expenses
- $2,216,956
- Assets
- $1,819,265
- Liabilities
- $66,983
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Pamela Hyde (Executive Director)
- Amanda Edgmon (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Pamela Hyde (Executive Director): $138,235 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To ease and heal the emotional trauma of the victim and the family guide the victim through the maze of the medical and legal systems, provide support for making informed decisions and advocate for victim.
What it reported doing in 2024
The CAC provides a multidisciplinary approach to the intervention, investigation, and prosecution of child abuse. No other agency in the community provides coordination of services for child abuse victims. CAC provides a consistent, non-threatening, developmentally appropriate approach to the forensic interviewing of children. Forensic interviewis allow a child to be interviewed once at which time the investigation team members gather information they need. This prevents repeated interviews by different individuals which can further traumatize a child. A client advocate shares resources with the non-offending caregivers to ensure that the family understands how to keep their children safe following an investigation as well as providing the family with information about community and government assistance available to them. The Center provides crisis intervention, hospital and judicial accompaniment, forensix inverviews, advocacy and therapy to all persons who report abuse, assault or witness domestic violence. Satellite offices are in Andrews and Big Spring TX.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.2%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.2% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.