Midland Habitat for Humanity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752381356
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Midland, TX, USA
Phone
4326868877
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,547,605
Expenses
$3,682,444
Assets
$13,207,597
Liabilities
$569,553

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ARICA GONZALES (President)
  • BRANDON BEVERSDORF (Vice President)
  • STEPHANIE HOUSTON (PAST PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOSEPH HOPKINS (Executive Dir.): $138,250 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Changing lives through affordable home ownership.

What it reported doing in 2024

For the year ended June 30, 2025, Midland Habitat for Humanity operated the following programs:(i) Affordable Homes Program: Land Development: As a homebuilder, Habitat will always need land and lots to construct homes, typically at the rate Habitat is building and selling houses each year. In order to ensure buildable lots in perpetuity, Habitat actively seeks donations of land/lots and purchases land/lots when donations are not possible. After acquiring the land, Habitat hires and works with contractors to do all the work needed to transform an undeveloped tract of land into a subdivision with roads and utilities ready to build houses on. This work requires extensive time and capital to ensure that Habitat has the land/lots needed to continue its program.Builder: Habitat is a construction company at its core and Habitat has two different housing models that Habitat constructs homes for.Traditional H1 Homes: This is our traditional Habitat model where homes are built and sold to people making 30-60% of the area's median income. People qualifying for this model must meet income guidelines, credit score minimum, complete sweat equity hours helping build homes, and complete a holistic homebuyers college course giving them the tools they need to thrive once they purchase their home. This model uses volunteers to help build homes and they are sold at cost with a 0% interest mortgage.H2 Homes: This is a supporting program that builds and sells homes targeting people making 60-80% of the area's median income. These homes are not built with homeowner sweat equity, donated materials, or volunteer construction help. Once completed, these homes are sold on the open market without the requirements of the traditional H1 model. This program serves three purposes 1) provides additional housing in a price point for-profit builders cannot afford to build in, 2) helps low-income families who dont qualify for our traditional program a homeownership option 3) provides program revenue used for land acquisition, and development in an ever-increasing market.Mortgage Company: Habitat sells H1 homes at no profit with a 0% interest loan, because that is not a financially viable option for banks Habitat has to issue and service its own mortgages to make that a possibility. This program allows Habitat to manually underwrite its loan to tailor requirements to Habitats low-income population which is almost always a first-time homebuyer. The income from the mortgages issued goes to support the overhead of the organization allowing it to sell homes at cost, without the need for a profit.(ii) ReStore: Habitat operates ReStore which is a non-profit retail outlet specializing in the resale of quality new and previously owned building materials, home furnishings, and appliances at 50-75% off retail prices. The income from the ReStore goes to support the overhead of the organization allowing it to sell homes at cost, without the need for a profit.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.7%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $32.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 43.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.59; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.7% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.