Middleton Youth Soccer Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201103797
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Middleton, MA, USA
Phone
5084239338
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,865
Expenses
$44,535
Assets
$53,030
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNY LUKIEWSKI (PRESIDENT)
  • FLAVIO PEREIRA (VICE PRESIDENT OF IN-TOWN)

People named in this filing

  • JENNY LUKIEWSKI (PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN SYLVESTER (TREASURER)
  • FLAVIO PEREIRA (VICE PRESIDENT OF IN-TOWN)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To develop, promote, and administer the sport of soccer for youth in the town of middleton, ma, including for their benefit development as young men and women (this being the higher and greater purpose of youth soccer) not just players.

What it reported doing in 2025

Outdoor soccer consists of two seasons, fall and spring, which are approximately 8 weeks in duration. The fall season runs from early september to early november; the spring season runs from early april until mid june. The organization is affiliated with the Massachusetts youth soccer association (mysa) and the essex county youth soccer association (ecysa). The organization runs three soccer programs during these seasons, including instructional and intramural, intramural, and travel.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.1%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.3%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.1% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $36K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.