Middlesex-somerset County Clc Aflcio C/o Ibew Local 456

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
226083942
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
North Brunswick, NJ, USA
Phone
7322462122
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$23,058
Expenses
$21,879
Assets
$45,163
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEAN PIERCE (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • WAYNE MARTIAK (PRESIDENT)
  • DARLENE SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAVE SCHNECK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • GREG CYR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DONALD NICKLE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JEAN PIERCE (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN MCCARTHY (RECORDING SECRETARY)
  • WAYNE MARTIAK (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote, through appropriate activities (such as advertising and other promotional events)in the geographical area covered by the charter of the middlesex-somerset county central labor council, afl/cio, the principles of the american federation of labor and congress of industrial organizations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Propose, support and promote legislation favorable to and to oppose legislation detrimental to the interest of workers and organized labor. Encourage workers to register and vote, to exercise their full rights and responsibilities of citizenship, and to perform their rightful part in the political life of the local, state and national communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 69% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 14
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.7%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.06; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.7% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.