Middle Georgia Youth Science & Technology Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043700110
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Warner Robins, GA, USA
Phone
4789264242
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Interdisciplinary Research

Reported finances

Revenue
$97,464
Expenses
$94,552
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Dean Laskey (Executive Direc)
  • Judy Goddard (Director)
  • Pat Bartness (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Middle Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center was established to promote interest and participation in math, science, technology, provide curriculum and instructional support to teachers in elementary and middle schools, and to provide educational experiences to youth and educators through special programs such as family science nights, school presentations, field experiences, summer and after school programs, and special events.

What it reported doing in 2013

Middle Georgia Youth Science & Technology Center (MGYSTC) was established to promote interest and participation in math, science, and technology, provide curriculum and instructional support to teachers in elementary and middle schools, and to provide educational experiences to youth and educators through special programs such as family science nights, school presentations, field experiences, summer and after school camps, and special events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.5%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 77.8%; rating input score 78

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 61.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -29.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.5% of revenue deployed · 77.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $74K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.