Mid-Willamette Family Y Veterans Housing
Legal name: Mid Willamette Family Y Veterans Housing
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 992497369
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Albany, Oregon, US
- Phone
- 5419742344
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,564,264
- Expenses
- $75,998
- Assets
- $1,488,266
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KERRY JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL SYKES (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KERRY JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL SYKES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SANDI GORDON (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mid-Willamette Family Y Veterans Housing provides affordable housing and supportive services that empower veterans to achieve stability, independence, and their fullest potential.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mid willamette family y veterans housing serves military veterans and their surviving spouses and dependents in the community by assisting them in locating and obtaining affordable housing, collaborating with other persons and entities in coordinating human services with other local nonprofit and government agencies to support veterans.in 2024, the organization began planning for building a new affordable housing apartment complex dedicated to veterans who fit within the 60% average median income.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 64% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 95
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 4
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 95.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.58; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed · 3.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $147K reported
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.