Mid Valley Chapter of National League of Young Men

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822423918
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Sherman Oaks, CA, USA
Phone
3104357031
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,039
Expenses
$47,473
Assets
$98,335
Liabilities
$54,546

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANA BEHAR (PRESIDENT)
  • RASHMI NAGAM (PRESIDENT-ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • MINDY PARK (TREASURER)
  • DANA BEHAR (PRESIDENT)
  • RASHMI NAGAM (PRESIDENT-ELECT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose of the national league of young men is to promote the development of young men into community leaders through a structured program focused on leadership, community service, cultural awareness, and protocol. The organization also fosters strong parent-son relationships and encourages civic responsibility and personal growth. During the year, the national league of young men provided a structured four year program for high school boys in grades 9-12 focused on leadership development, community service, cultural education, and personal growth. Members participated in over 80 hours of community service, benefiting a variety of local nonprofit organizations. The chapter hosted leadership workshops, cultural outings, and etiquette events aimed at developing well-rounded, civic-minded young men. Approximately 100 young men and their families actively participated in the program during the year.

What it reported doing in 2025

The national league of young men successfully carried out its exempt purpose by providing a four-year leadership, service, and personal development program for young men in grades 9-12. The organization hosted a range of structured activities through the year, including leadership workshops, community service events, cultural outings, and etiquette training. During the reporting period, over 100 members participated in the program, completed more than 40 service hours that benefited numerous local nonprofit organization and community partners. Events included volunteering at food banks, assisting with charity events, particpating in environment cleanups, and supporting senior care centers. In addition to service, members attended workshops and presentations aimed at enhancing public speaking, leadership, and interpersonal skills. The program aslo encouraged family engagement, with mothers participating in planning and organizational support, strengthening parent-child bonds. Through these efforts, the chapter fulfilled its mission of developing responsible, community-minded young men with strong leadership skills and a commitment to service.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.1%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.9%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.07; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.