Mid-peninsula Boys & Girls Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941431583
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Menlo Park, CA, USA
Phone
6506466132
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$258,032
Expenses
$763,459
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFF NIX (President)
  • CHRIS DILLON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JEFF NIX (President)
  • CHRIS DILLON (Vice President)
  • DANIELLE SIMON (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of mid-peninsula boys and girls club, inc. Is to inspire and enable all young people especially those who need us the most, to reach their full potential asproductive, responsible, and caring citizens.

What it reported doing in 2022

Mid-peninsula boys & girls club runs after-school and out of school lifestyles, and good character and leadership. Our programs are designed to assist and support low-income students in closing the achievement gap with their more affluent peers.academic support: programs include but are not limited to homework help, one-on-one tutoring, school break camps aimed at keeping kids' academic skills sharp while they are out of school. A cariety of programs are offerred to achieve objective results including: (a) power hour: making minutes count provides club professionals with the strategies, activities, resources and information to create an engaging homework help and tutoring program that encourages club members of every age to become self-directed learners, (b) project learn reinforces the academic enrichment and school engagement of young people during the time they spend at the club, (c) diplomas2degrees (d2d), a college readiness program, provides a range of serices to guide club members as they work toward high school graduation and prepare for post-secondary education and career success, (d) summer brain gain is comprised of one-week modules with fun, themed activities for elementary school, middle school and high school students that are aligned with common core anchor standards. In addition, summer brain gain: read!, a literacy program, complements the larger summer brain gain curriculum, (e) one-on-one tutoring, because sometimes our members need more support to what they have been taught during school. This is where dedicated community volunteers come in. Our one-on-one tutoring program matches members who need more help with caring colunteers that guide and support them, and (f) money matters promotes financial responsibility and independence among club members ages 13 to 18. Participants learn how to manage a checking account, create a budget, save and invest, start small businesses and pay for college.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 75.1%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.3 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -195.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 75.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $573K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2009 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.