Mid-Kansas Community Action Program Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 480728001
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Augusta, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3167753000
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $786,908
- Expenses
- $819,024
- Assets
- $1,223,327
- Liabilities
- $653,818
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BEN GRABER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BAMBI FULTON (EXECUTIVE DI): $80,990 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mid-Kansas community action program assists people in poverty move towards self-reliance through advocacy, education, training and housing in the counties we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mid-ks cap was awarded 303,000 from housing and urban development (hud) through the balance of state continuum of care grant. Mid-ks cap works with partner agencies and the community to provide homeless families and individuals the opportunity to resolve their housing crisis through the efficient use of a pool of available community resources. The housing and beyond project utilizes rapid rehousing dollars from the housing and urban development (hud) program to assist families and /or individuals in butler, harvey, reno, marion, sumner, and cowley counties in Kansas. The goal is to quickly obtain permanent housing. Once housing is secured short-term or long-term services, depending on customer needs, and accessing community linkages to services are provided through case management until the attainment of housing stability. This project serves homeless individuals and/or families that have obstacles that prevent obtaining permanent housing. Services provided may include financial assistance, budget counseling, landlord advocacy, and linkages to community agencies that will provide services sufficient to enable the family to obtain and maintain permanent housing. Services are provided in a manner that enhances the family's stability, respects the family's uniqueness, and enables the family to establish and maintain a permanent home. Housing is a primary goal of working with people experiencing homelessness. Aftercare may not always be needed; however, it can be expected in the majority of cases. During a one-year period, each family will be part of a case management program that includes mentoring, increasing income, increasing education if needed, financial literacy training, and optional classes such as parenting, stress management, etc. Csbg funds are used to support the match requirement of this award. The agency assisted 258 individuals to obtain safe and affordable permanent housing. The case management approach consists of crisis intervention, emergency services, screening and needs assessment. Families who have become homeless have immediate trauma situations that need to be accommodated, including the provision of emergency shelter. There is a screening of the challenges and resources that will affect a re-housing plan. The provision of services to help families access and sustain housing includes working with the client to identify affordable units, access housing subsidies, and negotiate leases. Clients may require assistance to overcome barriers, such as poor tenant history, credit history, and discrimination based on ethnicity, gender, family make-up, and income source. Individual and family workers need assistance to identify landlords willing to work with the program and engage in strategies to increase participation. Mid-ks cap operates 24 low-income housing units in rural communities. The program encourages families with children to remain in communities, thus raising the school tax base. It has been noted by the agency that placing a new home in a rundown area tends to improve the entire neighborhood. Safe affordable housing is one key to reaching self-reliance. Tenants in low-income rental units are provided information on creating credit and credit repair. Tenants are given an opportunity to purchase the housing unit they occupy and provided with the tools to make that happen.whitewater and eureka cities have both identified the need for food and nutrition programs. The agency will be working with community leaders to develop projects to address the needs of each community. As a result of the pandemic, based on the urgent and widespread needs affecting all sectors of the community, services focused on the pandemic crisis and emerged based on economic and health crises. The employment impacts of the pandemic were immediate, and profound and continue to negatively impact individuals and families. Mid-ks cap was able to identify funding and increase capacity to assist 546 eligible applicants. Case management ser
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 88% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.3%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.1%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.49; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.3% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $739K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.