Mid Hudson Workshop for the Disabled Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141395427
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8454713820
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Vocational Rehabilitation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $837,606
- Expenses
- $977,920
- Assets
- $1,739,063
- Liabilities
- $139,932
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAURA KIESBYE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA KIESBYE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $94,414 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission: we train and provide employment opportunities for veterans, people with disabilities, and low-income individuals. Our vision: empowering individuals to attain financial sustainability one training opportunity at a time.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organizations mission since beginning in 1948 has been to provide meaningful work for the physically and medically disabled veterans and others to accomplish its mission. The organization provides light manufacturing and fulfilment services to businesses. Disabled employees are thus provided a workplace where they can use their skills in a supportive environment and possibly transition to a regular full time job. Revenue is obtained by providing services to customers willing to use the services of the mid-hudson workshop and its disabled employees. It has therefore been a goal to acquire customers that provide steady and continuous work. In fact, some customers have been with the organization for more than 22 years. In 2022, we were donated north river roasters roastery and we now have a dba north river roasters (but the dba was finalized in 2023). The roastery goal is to provide entreprenuerial business programming skills, learning the art of roasting coffee, managing business inventory, customer service, bagging, order filling, etc. Coffee roasting has added an entreprenuerial program to our 2023 portfolio. We added a printing and graphic design program that is still being developed, but began in 2024 with the initial printer donation from name bubbles as of april 2024, we do not have any manufacturing currently in house. The number of individuals served in 2024 was 17.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 78.8%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.8%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.78; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $771K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.