Mid-hudson Road Runners Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222512355
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Lagrangeville, NY, USA
Phone
8454534707
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Camps

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,030
Expenses
$133,982
Assets
$131,481
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL TANZI (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TOM STOREY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • IRV MILLER (BOARD MEMBER)
  • LINDA STOW (BOARD MEMBER)
  • LORI DECKER (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the mid-hudson road runners club is to promote interest and participation in the sports of track and field and distance running, both on a recreational and competitive level, and to sponsor competitive meets, informal (non-competitive) meets, open and age-group runs, and other events for track enthusiasts of all ages and abilities.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization held approximately 8-10 runs and track series to promote interest and participation in the sports of track and field and distance running, both on a recreational and competitive level, and to sponsor competitive meets, informal (non-competitive) meets, open and age-group runs, and other events for track enthusiasts of all ages and abilities.the largest program service accomplishments were for the dutchess county classic and the turkey trot. All of the organizations runs combined allowed for grants to be given to students of fdr high school and funds to be contributed to other non profit organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.7%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.7% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $119K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.