Mid-coast Board of Realtors

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010403851
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Camden, ME, USA
Phone
2073900159
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$168,105
Expenses
$145,748
Assets
$179,110
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VICTORIA CONDON (PRESIDENT)
  • KIMBERLEY RUSH (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • CINDY HARDING (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MONET YARNELL (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFER JOHANSON (ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE)
  • VICTORIA CONDON (PRESIDENT)
  • KIMBERLEY RUSH (PRESIDENT-ELECT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote professionalism in the realtor organization, keep the members informed of important issues affecting the real estate profession, to support legislation that protects private property rights, small business interests and independent contractor issues and to provide opportunities for real estate education.

What it reported doing in 2025

Promotes professionalism and provides education to keep members informed of important issues affecting real estate professionals. Protect private property rights, small business interests.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.2%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 53.3%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 41.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.2% of revenue deployed · 53.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $78K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.