Mid Carolina Home Care Specialists Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562139562
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Morrisville, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9194659300
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,212,835
- Expenses
- $4,431,281
- Assets
- $4,135,817
- Liabilities
- $532,755
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide infusion, respiratory, home medical equipment and enteral nutrition services to residents of North Carolina.
What it reported doing in 2010
Mid-carolina provides infusion therapy, enteral & respiratory services, and home medical equipment to patients who require physician prescribed therapy at home. Mid-carolina delivers the most appropriate, cost-effective services available. Patients are admitted regardless of financial status. In 2010, mid-carolina provided $286,713 of free care. Additionally, 14,323 patients were served and 102,750 therapy days were provided in 2010.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $275K · 6 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.