Mid-carolina Gun Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
570484675
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Orangeburg, SC, USA
Phone
8032383510
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$199,799
Expenses
$88,621
Assets
$388,995
Liabilities
$3,680

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Todd Salvagin (President)

People named in this filing

  • Todd Salvagin (President)
  • Amanda Rudd (Secretary)
  • John Wrenn (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Club provides members and guests with a safe place to shoot and enjoy the sport of the same. In addition, in cooperation with the SC Dept of Natural Resources and Future Farmers of America, events are hosted for youth hunter safety classes and youth shooting competition for national youth groups. Also, national shooting sports hold competition events at the club.

What it reported doing in 2024

In cooperation with the SC Dept of Natural Resources and Future Farmers of America, events are hosted for youth hunter safety classes and youth shooting competition for national youth groups. Also, national shooting sports hold competition events at the club.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 32
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.8%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 50.1%; rating input score 50

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 55.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.39; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.8% of revenue deployed · 50.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.