Mid Atlantic Alpaca Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541819529
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Renfrew, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7247897345
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,842
- Expenses
- $70,788
- Assets
- $5,403
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Bill Oraschin (Vice President)
- Carole Rost (President & CEO)
People named in this filing
- Brad Kessler (Director)
- Cheri Seiler (Secretary)
- Arlene Fusko (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide education, and support to alpaca owners to establish or grow their businesses and become successful through the the website, meetings, and conference calls. Our event, "Mapaca Jubilee", open to the public, with lectures, demos, and shows for alpacas.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide education, Guidance, support and other resources to help new and existing alpaca owners, breeders, and related alpaca-related businesses to establish or grow their businesses. and become successful in the alpaca industry. We do this through an informative website, annual meetings, and conference calls. Our major event, "the Mapaca Jubilee", is open to the public and held annually in the mid-Atlantic region. It features free lectures, demonstrations, shows for alpacas, alpaca youth performance classes, and alpaca fleeces, breeder exhibits and vendors with a festival format.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.3%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.