Microsociety Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232637830
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2159224006
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,560,773
Expenses
$1,110,337
Assets
$635,062
Liabilities
$354,483

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • CAROLYNN KING-RICHMOND (EXECUTIVE DI): $91,042 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization seeks to cultivate thinkers, problem solvers, and innovators ready to compete in the 21st century global economy by providing children and youth the opportunity to experiment, create, produce, and modify in their own interdependent, free market communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Professional services major updates were made to our existing curriculum, including refreshes of our business venture guidebooks and digital versions of key microadventures lessons for inclusion in microsociety 2.0. New materials introduced this year include a teacher facilitator manual and stock market curriculum. All curriculum and instructional resources align with standards and connect to the increasingly complex real world of the microsociety learning environment. To meet the needs of students and educators in this ever-changing educational landscape, msi continues developing two digital tools: 1) microsociety? 2.0, a customizable web portal that utilizes google technologies and a digital financial system that uses custom software for piloting schools to take their microsocieties online, accelerate financial literacy and other career skills development, and expose students to 21st- century digital careers, and 2) 4th terra? , a 3d online simulation "game as service" to support subject matter instruction, particularly stem, along with critical thinking, decision-making and communication skills. In particular, the simulation facilitates students' ability to think deeply from multi-perspectives which is assessed through six metrics. With the support of ag strategic design, our digital platform underwent a significant makeover to reflect our new branding. We introduced microsociety career tools, including the futurefinder engine, which allows students to explore career possibilities based on their interests. We also launched pilots of microsociety 2.0 and 4th terra at a microsociety school in New Jersey. Msi's new heart and heartcorps curricula are being disseminated to sites around the country. This curriculum was created in response to the pandemic-era social, emotional, and health needs of students. In addition, msi created a new "firm foundation" sequence, culminating in a citizenship contract, for the start of the school year, and we also rolled out a new "plan/act/reflect" framework to better shape the microtime schedule and prepared our certified consultants to bring it to schools.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 68
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.1%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.1% of revenue deployed · 78.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $876K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $91K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.