Michigans Tomorrow

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472384695
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Midland, MI, USA
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Expenses
$2,709
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEPH AFFHOLTER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSEPH AFFHOLTER (PRESIDENT)
  • WILLIAM LEIKHIM (TREASURER)
  • RICHARD OLSON (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Purpose of the organization is: a to operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of and visitors to the State of Michigan b to support public policies on the Federal State and local levels that will bring about civic betterments and social improvements to Michigan c to support programs aimed at improving Michigans business climate and employment opportunities d to encourage and advocate citizen participation in political civic and governmental events and associated activities e to support activities and programs that improve the quality and effectiveness of government for the state of Michigan f to support charitable causes including but not limited to lessening the burdens of government gto conduct and carry on all or the forgoing activities in any state or territory of the United States in conformity with the laws of such state or territory

What it reported doing in 2025

To support public policies on the Federal State and local levels that will bring civic betterment and social improvements to Michigan residents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 23
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 62%; rating input score 62

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.6% per year; rating input score 0; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.4% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.