Michigan Pork Producers Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

19 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

The association was established to promote, educate, and inform the public about the pork industry.

Educational seminars- educate pork producers on new research and technology to increase efficiency and operations.

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 48.1%; rating input score 48; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: 12.1%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 15.8%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: 37.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 19 people listed
Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 48/100.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.