Michigan Career Placement Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383523529
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Jackson, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5178127465
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Employment Procurement Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,194
- Expenses
- $36,497
- Assets
- $63,444
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CINDY PHILIP (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- TAMMY RUTLEDGE (PAST PRESIDENT)
- SARAH BECKLE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CINDY PHILIP (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- TAMMY RUTLEDGE (PAST PRESIDENT)
- JAMIEPARKER (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide career preparation activities for students and school staff member in regard to co-op job placement in local businesses. Provide workshops for school staff regarding state/federal laws on student employment. Work with the Department of Education to establish and modify guidelines.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide career preparation activities for students and school staff member in regard to co-op job placement in local businesses. Provide workshops for staff regarding state/federal laws on student employment. Work with the Department of Education to establish and modify guidelines.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 62% for direct work, 14% for grants, and 24% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 40.3%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 59.9%; rating input score 60
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.7%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 40.3% of revenue deployed · 59.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.