Michigan Association of Ambulance Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237370259
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Lansing, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5174853376
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $717,066
- Expenses
- $728,017
- Assets
- $668,388
- Liabilities
- $468,442
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JASON MACDONALD (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN SCRIBNER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- JOHN CLAYTON (PRESIDENT)
- ANGELA MADDEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELA MADDEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $170,199 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide an organized and unified voice for ambulance services to intermediaries, legislators, and regulatory bodies; to develop and promote a code of ethics for ambulance services; to provide for the exchange of appropriate information with those interested in ambulance services and pre-hospital medical care; to promote understanding, cooperation and communication among ambulance services; to develop and promote high standards of patient care and assurance of quality in pre-hospital care; to initiate, sponsor, and promote educational programs, cost savings projects and research in the ambulance industry; to assemble and disseminate information about ambulance services, issues and needs to ambulance services, appropriate bodies and individuals; to promote cooperation with existing organizations at local, state and national levels; to promote health care and safety in the state of Michigan.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided resources and advocacy for ambulance services in Michigan including education programs, research, understanding and communication among ambulance services. Michigan association of ambulance services served approximately 100 members in 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $170K · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.