Michigan Abolitionist Project
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454577135
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Dearborn Heights, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5866048052
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Spouse Abuse, Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $64,044
- Expenses
- $152,881
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christopher Johnson (Board President)
- Kathy Maitland (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Christopher Johnson (Board President)
- Dawn Symington Conners (Treasurer)
- Jessica Pate (Board Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To prevent and end human trafficking through education to the community, outreach initiatives, collaboration with stakeholders, and through the dissemination of facts, statistics, and narratives from human trafficking survivors.
What it reported doing in 2021
Collaboration program facilitated forums for advocates, service providers and agencies to network and collaborate in order to build capacity and effectiveness in Michigan's anti-trafficking movement
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 5
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.4%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 21.1%; rating input score 21
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -138.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.4% of revenue deployed · 21.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $32K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.