Michael Fields Agricultural Institute Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391449246
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- East Troy, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2626423303
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Agricultural Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,533,841
- Expenses
- $2,461,248
- Assets
- $3,483,758
- Liabilities
- $478,305
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREGG SANFORD (PRESIDENT (THRU MAY))
- UNA VANDUVAL (PRESIDENT (FROM MAY))
- RYAN MARTIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- RYAN MARTIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $97,400 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Michael fields agricultural institute's mission is to help rural and urban farms and agricultural communities in Wisconsin and beyond be healthy environmentally, economically, and socially.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education - michael fields agricultural institute's education program focuses on outreach for federal programs, and providing learning opportunities through workshops, events and webinars where learning happens with professionals or in a peer-to-peer setting/model. The education programs at mfai include Wisconsin women in conservation (wiwic), midwest grain resources & immersion training (midwest grit), milwaukee urban ag network (muan), share, and 2501. These programs are actively creating events in the educational space and engaging stakeholders in all of this programming. Our outreach efforts are strengthened by partnerships with other non profits in the ag space, community organizations and our collaborative efforts with the universities across the region.the education department mainly focuses on outreach for federal programs, and providing learning opportunities through workshops, events and webinars where learning happens with professionals or in a peer-to-peer setting/model. The education programs at mfai include Wisconsin women in conservation (wiwic), midwest grain resources & immersion training (midwest grit), milwaukee urban ag network (muan), share, and 2501. These programs are actively creating events in the educational space and engaging stakeholders in all of this programming. Our outreach efforts are strengthened by partnerships with other nonprofits in the ag space, community organizations and our collaborative efforts with the universities in the midwest. Wiwic programming (funded by usda-nrcs) includes in-person events where women are connected with resources, both in the knowledge and financial realm, and other virtual webinars where learning happens to be better stewards of the land. Conservation and soil health are two very important topics that are discussed at these outreach events, along with conservation practices like rotational grazing, forest management, managing invasive species, planting natives, pollinators and prairie habitats. Field days are avenues for the stakeholders to see in person the implementation of conservation practices while getting guidance on how they can implement those practices on their own farms. Demonstrations on soil health are an important part of these events which are conducted in different parts of Wisconsin in partnership with other nonprofits. Our programming also involves conservation educators, and they are provided with the opportunity to connect every year through in-person events in different parts of the state, and virtual meets. Through the wiwic program, more than 3000 women were served through events and monthly newsletters. Providing technical assistance is the most important service offered to our stakeholders through this program. Women utilized this service with such interest and ease, and the program was able to help write more than 100 conservation plans for women landowners, 25% of whom applied for a federal cost share program (eqip).milwaukee urban ag network programming helps urban gardeners and farmers in milwaukee understand and learn about urban gardening, soil health, grain farming, community building organizations, federal agencies like nrcs and fsa (usda) that can provide cost share for conservation practices, education and professional networking. Regenerative ag practices that are beneficial to soil health are also highlighted through stakeholder engagement and sharing. Share farmer stakeholders also are provided similar learning opportunities. A three-part series on grain farming on a small scale, a workshop on extending the growing season, a series on soil health and another on land access were some of the workshops offered. A seed swap event was organized in april and is our way of connecting with the community in east troy promoting nutritious and healthy food. Midwest grit (grains resource immersive training), an mfai education program is a peer-to-peer learning model that is grant-funded by usda beginning farmer and rancher development
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 76% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $166.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.2%; rating input score 99; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 37 of 39 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.