Michael D Gill Memorial Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993748541
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Nw Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2023031143
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Commemorative Events

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,011
Expenses
$58,117
Assets
$89,347
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • J CHRISTOPHER GIANCARLO (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIC PAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • J CHRISTOPHER GIANCARLO (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIC PAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NEAL KUMAR (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To further the memory of michael d. Gill and his public service by promoting and supporting the commodity futures trading commission (the "cftc") in hosting and sponsoring educational lectures to educate the public about financial regulation.

What it reported doing in 2025

"michael d. Gill lecture on international financial regulatory nderstanding and cooperation wednesday, october 15, 2025" the second annual lecture was be offered by jean-paul servais. Mr. Servais is chair of the international organization of securities commissions (iosco). Iosco is the leading international policy forum for securities regulators and is recognized as the global standard setter for securities regulation. Approximately 300 people attended the lecture.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 131.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -46.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.8% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.