Micah Raelynn Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474702469
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Lake Junaluska, NC, USA
Phone
8285931959
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,126
Expenses
$1,132
Assets
$1,194

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KANDACE BOONE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • KANDACE BOONE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DONNA BEST (CHAIRPERSON)
  • GARRY WOOTEN (VICE CHAIRPERSON)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Offering sudden infant death syndrome awareness and prevention as well as grief support for families who have lost a child during infancy (0-12 months). Our mission is to ensure a healthier outcome for babies in our community through education and empowerment, and to provide empathy and encouragement to families in the event this devastating loss should occur.

What it reported doing in 2015

Worked with local hospital, health department, and pediatric doctor's offices to educate parents and families about risk factors that babies and children face, before they are even birthed. Our focus has primarily been on prenatal care, abstinence from drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, and safe sleep. Welcome bags are provided to each newborn birthed at the local hospital which provided education and resource materials to empower parents to follow safety measures. Parents that can not afford a safe place for infants to sleep are referred to an organization that can assist with cribs. Grief packages are prepared for distribution to parents and families faced with the devastation of the loss of a child.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.