Mianus River Gorge Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133523329
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Bedford, NY, USA
Phone
9142343455
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Wildlife Sanctuary, Refuge

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,518,012
Expenses
$1,261,960
Assets
$30,774,454
Liabilities
$94,470

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN S NEEDHAM (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RODERICK CHRISTIE (EXECUTIVE DI): $219,700 total reported compensation
  • LESLIE ZACHARY (DEV DIRECTOR): $133,037 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTOPHER M NAGY (R&E DIRECTOR): $116,570 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mianus river gorge, inc.'s mission is to protect irreplaceable natural habitats for our community, wildlife and future generations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Land protection: in 2025 mrg continued to work on land projects that we hope will lead to more protected land in the future. Mrg also continued habitat restoration work on many of the lands acquired in previous years including invasive species removal, replanting of native species, and protection of rare plant communities. Research & education: research assistantship program (rap) offers funding for graduate-level research in the fields of ecology and conservation. Each rap recipient receives a yearly stipend of 5000 for three years toward a specific project addressing an ecological question that affects mrg. Rap recipients also mentor high school students in our wtp program. In 2025, mrg hosted the rap student from cornell university, who is in the final year of his study, and also co-authored three scholarly papers. College intern program in suburban ecology (cise) offers internships to undergraduate students to study a variety of issues facing suburban preserves. Students work with staff and rap and wtp students. Mrg hosted four undergraduate interns in 2025. Our wildlife technician program (wtp) offers high school students from the region the opportunity to conduct a 2.5-year (from 10th grade to 12th grade) research study under the mentorship of our staff and rap students. The program was designed to complement the state university of New York science research in the high school (srhs) curriculum and provides access to scientific mentors, hands-on field experience, and immersion into real- world conservation problems facing suburban ecosystems. In 2025, mrg mentored 12 wtp students across 10th to 12th grade. Public programs & outreach: in 2025, mrg staff presented numerous public programs across the region about co-existing with bears, consulted with community members about invasive species biology and management, and lead general education programs / nature walks for approx. 100 people. Specific topics included deploying wildlife cameras; the old-growth forest; birding; owl biology; and winter tree id. Stewardship: in ongoing efforts to improve trail conditions for an estimated 12,000 annual visitors to the preserve, mianus river gorge created a stable path over safford cascade along the red trail. They placed large stepping stones in the stream that made the crossing safer and improved the natural flow of the stream. Mianus river gorge systematically follows a land management plan that divides protected land into management units, each with a specific strategy based on phenology and habitat type.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 41
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.7%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 66.2%; rating input score 66
  • Fundraising efficiency: $18.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 72.1%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 24.39; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 37.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.7% of revenue deployed · 66.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $835K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $220K · 24 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.