MATA – మాతా (మయామి వ్యాలీ తెలుగు సంఘం) MiamiValley Area Telugu Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311602885
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2019
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Dayton, OH, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hinduism
Affiliation
Hinduism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,246
Expenses
$44,918
Assets
$64,408

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ramnarayan Nunna (President)
  • Vasundhara Appalaneni (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Ramnarayan Nunna (President)
  • Vasundhara Appalaneni (President & CEO)
  • Sarita Vallabhaneni (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

MATA is a non-profit organization established to help preserve and propagate Telugu culture in the Dayton-Springfield, OH metropolitan area. MATA organizes various programs to bring together the people of Telugu origin to promote cultural, economical and social causes. The new association organized its first cultural program celebrating the Telugu New Year (Ugaadi) on April 1, 1995 with more than 200 people in attendance. A constitution was adopted for the new organization, and the first Executive Committee was elected and installed. Since then, the organization has been very active. MATA organizes two functions every year: a cultural program celebrating Ugaadi and a picnic on the Sunday following Labor Day. MATA also supports the Telugu day during the Navaratri celebrations at the Hindu Temple of Dayton. In addition, MATA brings visiting Telugu artists from India to the area. MATA...

What it reported doing in 2019

MATA not for profit corporation established and operated exclusively for educational, scientific, literary and charitable purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -37.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.