Miami Port-de-paix Global Solidarity Partnership Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923189460
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
3052068332
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$517,849
Expenses
$250,300
Assets
$209,977
Liabilities
$52

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDRES NOVELA (PRESIDENT)
  • ANTHONY VINCIGUERRA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANTHONY VINCIGUERRA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $75,628 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The miami/port-de-paix, haiti, global solidarity partnership (gsp) leverages south Florida resources into long-term, sustainable, social, economic, and environmental development projects in the archdiocese of miami's sister-diocese of port-de-paix, haiti - the poorest region of the poorest country in the western hemisphere.

What it reported doing in 2024

1 - the cocano fair/direct trade coffee and cacao project: through our support for cafire et cacaouyre du nord ouest (cocano) coffee/cacao cooperative, and in collaboration with panther coffee and exquisito chocolates, the gsp helped bring 100% organic coffee and cacao to market in a fair/direct trade relationship that empowers local communities, reforests the land, and builds a sustainable socio-economic infrastructure for haiti's future. In fy25, cocano produced the largest cacao export, ever, in nw haiti's history exporting employing hundreds of farmers and their families in the process.2 - the atelye thevenet fair/direct trade artisan initiative: in partnership with the atelye thevenet fair/direct trade artisan workshop in jean rabel, haiti, the gsp has been proud to offer unique, handcrafted items that empower women in one of the western hemisphere's most impoverished regions. In partnership with multiple catholic institutions from south Florida and beyond, thousands of dollars of artisan goods - from colorful paintings, to hand-painted crosses, to custom-made tote bags, messenger bags, and backpacks were developed and sold in fair/direct trade partnerships that brought sustainable income to the women of the atelye and their families.3 miami/port-de-paix special assistance projects: additionally, in collaboration with the religious of jesus and mary in jean rabel, and thanks to a special donation received for the program, the gsp and its supporters were able to support a major special project that helped provide a mobile medical clinic, support for eye surgeries, home building projects, and sustainable school-based agriculture programs in the nw town of jean rabel.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.6%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: $105.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 51.7%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.6% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $238K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.