Miami Cerebral Palsy Residential Services, Inc.
Legal name: Miami Cerebral Palsy Residential Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 592210228
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hialeah, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3057281534
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $31,385,616
- Expenses
- $30,516,659
- Assets
- $18,802,868
- Liabilities
- $5,930,467
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDA GLUCK CPA (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- LINDA GLUCK CPA (PRESIDENT/CEO): $295,641 total reported compensation
- MARTA MORIN (FORMER CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER (END 06/24)): $254,783 total reported compensation
- BETTY RODRIGUEZ (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $173,661 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission exists to support people of all abilities and backgrounds on their path to achieving their highest potential in an environment that thrives on love, care and respect that feels like home and family.
What it reported doing in 2024
Medical services: miami cerebral palsy operates its residential homes with registered and licensed nurses 24 hours per day, including nursing support at the life long learning program. The agency has a medical director who makes rounds weekly and is on-call twenty four hours a day. The nursing department is managed by a qualified director of nursing, and each location is assigned a registered nurse/health care coordinator whose sole responsibility is to oversee the clinical component of the individuals residing at each specific location as well as to supervise the nurses. Miami cerebral palsy collaborates with other physicians, and the homes are located near baptist hospital, kendall regional hospital and miami children's hospital. Jackson memorial hospital and joe dimaggio are utilized for other consults with various specialists in meeting the multiple needs of the individuals. A comprehensive individualized health care plan is developed for each individual requiring one; health risk factors are identified with appropriate interventions. The health care plan is incorporated as part of the individual's habilitation process and it is monitored by the interdisciplinary to ensure the best possible health outcomes. Part of the individual's health care plan development is the inclusion of the licensed and registered dietitian, who not only assures a well balanced diet but offers a menu that it is inclusive of various cultures while remaining nutritious. Miami cerebral palsy specializes in supporting individuals who are fed via enteral means, (via tube), and through the collaboration of the interdisciplinary process, proactively assesses and works towards the elimination of dependence on enteral feedings to consumption of nutrition orally (whenever possible), with a high success rate. Another specialized area for mcprs is their partnership with consulting respiratory therapists who are on-call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Through the collaborative efforts of the nursing staff and that of the respiratory therapist, aggressive treatment is provided to include supporting individuals on ventilator support, often decreasing the need for hospitalizations and increasing participation in activities of daily living.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $26.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $296K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $709K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.