Metter-candler Chamber of Commerce Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 580681762
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Metter, GA, USA
- Phone
- 9123144659
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $99,755
- Expenses
- $107,307
- Assets
- $136,112
- Liabilities
- $153
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
People named in this filing
- ERICA ALLEN (CHAIRMAN)
- TRACIE LANK (DIRECTOR)
- MAGAN RECENDIZ (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the metter-candler chamber of commerce is to advance the commercial, agricultural, industrial, governmental, and civic interests of metter and candler county; to promote integrity and good faith, just and equitable principles in business; to acquire, preserve and distribute industrial information of value, and to engage in and promote such projects as may be consistent with improvement of the community. The chamber serves as the voice of business in metter-candler county and supports the growth of business and industry in the area through a variety of programs and events. The metter-candler chamber of commerce also offers numerous business networking events, allowing members to develop new customer and client leads. Members may also play a role in marketing the county and its businesses, improving workforce development and education, leadership development and government affairs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Programs and events to promote business networking events, allow members to develop new customer and client leads, and market candler county and its businesses
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.6%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.