Metrowest Medical Center Medical Staff Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010715375
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Hyannis, MA, USA
Phone
8778295500
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Support Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$302,645
Expenses
$261,751
Assets
$465,678
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA SOTIR (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER ARTICK (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • LISA SOTIR (PRESIDENT): $60,000 total reported compensation
  • DONALD ADAMS (CLERK/TREASURER): $20,000 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER ARTICK (VICE PRESIDENT): $10,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

1. To support the advancement of the knowledge and practice of, and education and research in, medicine, surgery and all other subjects relating to the care, treatment and healing of humans, to improve the health and welfare of all persons, and to develop, sponsor and promote services and programs which are charitable, scientific or educational and which address the physcial and mental needs of the community at large.2. To encourage and participate in activities designed and carried on to provide and improve the general public health of the community at large.3. To provide support and assistance in whatever form to organizations which qualify as exempt form tax under section 501 (a) and sections 501 (c)(3) of the internal revenue code or under any successor sections thereto, for the purpose of promoting the health of the community at large.4. To conduct such other activities and programs in furtherance of the foregoing charitable, scientific and educational purpose.

What it reported doing in 2025

Educational conferences for staff physicians at metrowest medical center to provide required cpe credits to all disciplines and education for resident physicians; including supplying educational books to various departments

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 15
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.6%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 59.3%; rating input score 59
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 10%; rating input score 10; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.5%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.78; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 34.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.6% of revenue deployed · 59.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 50 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $155K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 10/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.