Metro United Methodist Urban Ministry
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352242763
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6192855556
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,627,557
- Expenses
- $1,685,246
- Assets
- $182,492
- Liabilities
- $282,785
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROLLAND E SLADE (President)
- CRAIG DORVAL (Vice President)
- JOHN HUGHES (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN HUGHES (CEO): $141,827 total reported compensation
- LINDA WOMACK (CAO): $131,531 total reported compensation
- LORNA PALLARES (COO): $110,068 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Metro United Methodist Urban Ministry is a faith based organization committed to empowering low income individuals, families, and communities to overcome poverty and to achieve self-sufficiency through employment, education, social services and leadership development.
What it reported doing in 2016
To promote the development of local congregations in their efforts to bridge the neighborhood gap between churches and communities, promote family development, youth leadership and education, and to provide a variety of job placement and work experience services to underprivileged families and individuals.The Good Neighbor Center was established in 1968 at Chollas View United Methodist Church in South East San Diego. The Metro United Methodist Urban Ministry's Board of Directors wanted to establish a center in the area where they could serve many people with the greatest amount of need. It was called the 'Good Neighbor' Center because it was recognized as 'good' place to go in the 'neighborhood'. It was a drop-in site for adults and families offering activities and small classes, as well as emergency food and clothing assistance. In 1987, the Reverend, Dr. Russ Locke, pastor of Nestor United Methodist Church, contacted Rev. James Mishler, former director of METRO, expressing a need for a second Good Neighbor Center to serve the South Bay Communities. So, the Nestor Good Neighbor Center opened its doors in November 1998 to serve the South Bay community with Gary D. Podschun as its first director. PROJECT EMPOWER/FEXO - A pre-post release workforce development program designed to improve the long term labor market prospects of juvenile offenders ages 14-21. Proposed services target female ex-offenders, however services will be provided to both male and female ex-offenders with a history of abuse, family turmoil, early puberty, learning disabilities and school failure, mental health and substance abuse issues. CLEAN SLATE/FACE FORWARD - Serves juvenile offender 16-24. This is a diversionary program with an expungement enhancement. The underpinnings of this approach will be Transformational Leadership - a four phase leadership development model, and will include mentoring with community and sector leaders, cognitive behavioral work place skills, community service learning and case management services-allowing young people to improve the long term labor market prospects. NEIGHBORHOOD COLLEGE - A workforce development program designed to provide capacity - building assistance to non-profit and faith based agencies, improving the long-term labor market prospects of juvenile offenders and in-school youth at risk of offending ages 14-21, targeting youth residing in high crime, high poverty areas. Metro will focus the efforts in 3 cities within the States of California, Arizona, and Georgia, each bearing high poverty and high crime statistics.MENTORING (Department of Justice and Esperanza) - Works with children in San Diego County with academic and behavior issues, and matches them with positive adult role models and mentors through in and out of school activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.9%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $680.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.55; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.9% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $142K · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2009 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.