Metro Philadelphia Chapter of American College of Surgeons
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232525075
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Middletown, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172205255
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,815
- Expenses
- $56,977
- Assets
- $31,637
- Liabilities
- $5,061
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALEY TOHAMY MD FACS (PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT JOSLOFF MD FACS (PRESIDENT-EL)
People named in this filing
- ALEY TOHAMY MD FACS (PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT JOSLOFF MD FACS (PRESIDENT-EL)
- RENEE THOLEY MD FACS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The metropolitan philadelphia chapter of the american college of surgeons is incorporated in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania under the nonprofit corporation laws of 1988. The purpose of the chapter is to advance the science, study, and practice of surgery, to establish a standard of competency and character for practitioners of surgery, and to educate the public regarding the practice of surgery.
What it reported doing in 2025
The annual joint dinner meeting, hosted by the metropolitan philadelphia chapter and the philadelphia academy of surgeons, returned to the marriott old town philadelphia on september 15, 2025, with 160 attendees. Keynote lecture was presented by dr. Larry kaiser, president & ceo and thomas w. Langfitt chair of the college of physicians, focused on his career from a general surgeon to a ceo. Fifty-seven posters were submitted with 30 presented by residents and medical students. The top scoring abstract provided a podium presentation to the attendees. Seven surgical industry partners participated in the exhibit hall to share information on new devices, treatments, and protocols.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.8%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 26 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.