Metro-manhattan Community Foundationinc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 134186074
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Englewood, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 3474322502
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,821
- Expenses
- $101,674
- Assets
- $602,397
- Liabilities
- $66,652
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Orchid Richardson (President)
- ROZALYNN FRAZIER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Orchid Richardson (President)
- ROZALYNN FRAZIER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- Thelma Dye (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The metro manhattan community foundation raises money to fund programs in five areas: youth leadership and development; arts and culture; international affairs; leadership development for african-american women; health and nutrition.
What it reported doing in 2024
SERVICE TO YOUTH - THIS FACET FOCUSES ON PROVIDING A RANGE OF INNOVATIVE, SUBSTANTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE PRE-K THROUGH 12TH GRADE PROGRAMMING, WHICH CONTRIBUTE PROVEN RESULTS TO KEY EDUCATIONAL OR SOCIAL COMMUNITY ISSUES.Arts and Culture facet provided enriching Arts related programs to children and youth of the Harlem community. Health and Human services provided workshops, nutritional and mental health support programs to youth and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 84% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -92.5%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.92; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $93K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.