Metro Atlanta Firefighters Conference Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823917841
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7705968255
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $99,567
- Expenses
- $108,577
- Assets
- $17,387
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
People named in this filing
- JASON HATTEN (CHIEF EXECUT)
- RAYMOND C VOGHT IV (CHIEF FINANC)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the metro atlanta firefighters conference, inc is to provide the exceptional training to firefighters at little or no cost. We strive to provide a forum for the best possible training in the region by bringing in top quality, nationally known speakers and highlighting the many talented local instructors. Primarily the organization will organize and conduct two weekend long training conferences per year in the metro atlanta area. We further realize that in these times of fiscal restraint, it is more important than ever to provide quality local training at little or no cost to the attendee.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization has organized and conducted annual weekend long training conferences, onc covering the entire spectrum of the fire service and one dealing specifically in the area of automobile extrication.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.8%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.8% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $97K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.