Methodist Home for Nursing and Rehabilitation
Legal name: Methodist Church Home for the Aged
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131740003
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Riverdale, NY, United States
- Phone
- 718-548-5100
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $29,312,708
- Expenses
- $23,794,395
- Assets
- $75,761,900
- Liabilities
- $10,042,681
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM WIESMAN (PRESIDENT)
- BEN JORDAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARIA PEREZ (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MARIA PEREZ (CEO): $474,119 total reported compensation
- GENEVIEVE CASTILLO (DIRECTOR OF NURSING): $236,119 total reported compensation
- SANDRA RIVERA (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $220,010 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Your Recovery, Our Mission. Group of Methodist Home staff in formal attire at the Methodist Home 2025 fall gala A Night of Celebration and Support at the Methodist Home Fall Gala We enjoyed an incredible evening together at our 2025 Fall Gala, held on October 16 at the beautiful Tappan Hill Mansion. The event was a heartwarming celebration of connection, generosity, and community of friends who gathered to support our mission of serving our short term rehabilitation patients and long term residents. Friends, families, staff, and.
What it reported doing in 2025
See schedule othe home provided 38,522 days of care to 775 residents needing skilled nursing and/or rehabilitation services. We seek to accomplish our mission through: - comprehensive support services: we are a full-service organization offering short and long-term care, and physical and social rehabilitation programs conducted by the highest quality medical and care staff. - person centered care: we focus on the interest of the individual by providing tailored care aimed at promoting health, dignity, and independence while celebrating the individuality of each resident within our diverse and vibrant community.- through the rogosin at methodist home, dialysis services are now offered on site.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 89%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.8%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.18; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 81% of revenue deployed · 89% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $474K · 24 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.