Messiah Echad Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463261554
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Georgetown, TX, USA
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $118,508
- Expenses
- $126,575
- Assets
- $1,304
- Liabilities
- $21,667
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Highest reported compensation
- JONATHAN DADE (RABBI): $53,361 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission and vision: to serve hebrew christian (torah observing), messianic jewish and non religious believers, by showing people how to love god (deuteronomy 6:5), love their neighbor (mathew 22:39) and love their savior (john 14:15) we exist to serve, show, and love, globally.
What it reported doing in 2020
Podcasts to 5203 worldwide listeners and 80 religious service events impacting 150 people
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 5
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.8%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 57.8%; rating input score 58
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 16.62; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 42.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 77.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.8% of revenue deployed · 57.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $73K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $53K · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.