Mesivta Yeshiva of Chestnut Ridge
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 874184658
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Airmont, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8455748444
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $532,567
- Expenses
- $708,108
- Assets
- $15,005
- Liabilities
- $249,871
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Shimon Yanofsky (President)
People named in this filing
- Shimon Yanofsky (President)
- Ahron Kaufman (Treasurer)
- Yitzchok Rabinowitz (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to provide a religious high school education to boys of Airmont, NY through academic schooling. The program will open an academicschool that teaches academic subjects for students in grades 9th-12th.The program will operate during academic year, with the exception of academic breaks.Our major focus will be on teaching academic subjects, including math, science, reading, social studies, etc. In addition to its focus on academic subjects, the school will integrate religious teachings into its activities. The school will be a boarding school.
What it reported doing in 2023
The Yeshiva caters to serious and focused studens who have not found success in their current school environment, but seek a genuine Yeshiva education. The Yeshiva will simultaneously provide a rigorous four-year sequential secular studies program. For the year ended August 31, 2024, the Yeshiva had 22 students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 52
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.9%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 58.6%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -33%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 16.65; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -60.3% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.9% of revenue deployed · 58.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $415K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.