Mercy Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 420698295
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Cedar Rapids, IA, USA
- Phone
- 3193986105
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $524,502,517
- Expenses
- $525,155,162
- Assets
- $755,979,447
- Liabilities
- $250,717,166
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIMOTHY QUINN MD (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- NATHAN VAN GENDEREN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & CFO)
- TIMOTHY L CHARLES (FORMER PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- CHONG C LEE MD (PHYSICIAN): $3,342,795 total reported compensation
- AMANDEEP DHALIWAL MD (PHYSICIAN): $1,571,849 total reported compensation
- VINCENT REID MD (PHYSICIAN): $1,375,528 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To care for the sick and enhance the health of the communities we serve, guided by the spirit of the sisters of mercy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mercy medical center (hospital) provides medical health care, including 24 hours a day, seven days a week trauma center service, to all patients accessing the system, regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age or ability to pay. A patient is classified as a charity patient by reference to certain estabilished policies of the hospital. Essentially, these policies define charity services as those services for which no or nominal payment is anticipated. Additionally, each hospital department accepts all patients who are covered by governmental indigent programs. Such indigent programs typically remit amounts substantially less than charges. The following summarizes the hospital's care of the uninsured and underinsured. Costs in excess of medicare reimbursement (costs of providing the services less the amounts received from medicare) - $53,450,000; other community benefits (includes subsidized health services, financial contributions) - $2,571,000; free service (to patients who meet mercy's free-service guidelines) - $5,240,000; costs in excess of medicaid reimbursement (costs of providing the services less the amounts received from medicaid) - $12,900,000, physician education - $(692,000). In addition, charity care and community service are provided through many reduced-price services and free programs offered throughout the year. These programs provide a bona fide community health need, including: a. Public and professional educational seminar are offered on a variety of topics including joint replacement surgery, prenatal education, diabetes, mental health disorders, and numerous other medical conditions of medical and psychosocial nature. Specialized cancer seminars are also offered. B. Hospital meeting facilities which are frequently used without charge by such groups as the american heart association, Iowa breast cancer foundation, healthy linn network advisory committee, overeaters anonymous, catholic laymen, united way, catherine mcauley center for women, the american cancer society. M.s. Support group, eastern Iowa oncology nurses society, the Iowa cancer consortium, the parent education consortium, arc of east central Iowa, and several other groups. C. Contributions of approximately 95,652 hours toward the common purpose of serving the health care of the community. The value of these contributions was approximately $1,507,000 and was given back to the community through lower costs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 80.5%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 92.4%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 70%; rating input score 70; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.1%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.44; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 80.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 20 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $422.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.3M · 35 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $26.5M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 31 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 28 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.